Rabu, 20 Agustus 2008

"The God Delusion" By Richard Dawkins. Philosophical Fiddling While Rome Burns

by: Tom Attea

While the world goes its self-destructive way – not entirely because humans differ in their beliefs about the nature of and existence or nonexistence of God – we have yet another book by a contemporary philosopher, riffling through the dusty bones of ancient arguments that can never be settled, because one opinion supported by inconclusive evidence can never disprove another opinion supported by inconclusive evidence.

The author, the widely known skeptic Richard Dawkins, chooses to take easy potshots at the traditional concept of God as presented in the Bible, the tribal tapestry of which contains threads that cannot, understandably enough, be neatly sorted out by logical analysis.

He also goes on to deal with the usual proofs presented by theologians for the existence of God – first trotted out by Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theologica, the Aristotelian riff in which he famously argued backward from his forgone conclusions.

But now let’s skip to a few questions that actually matter.

Is the philosophical urgency of the day about the nature of, existence or non-existence of God? Can we, the grumbling creatures of finitude, even credibly analyze such enormous questions? Or are we left to sustain our beliefs, pro or con, with a leap to faith, the precipice remaining unspecified?

Now, let’s stop fooling around and ask the most consequential question. Does the peace of the world and our survival depend on resolving the ancient logical conundrums about the nature and existence of God?

It seems to us that even a country bumpkin sitting on his porch, noshing on a sprout of homegrown wheat, would realize that the far more urgent question is how the human race can be encouraged to develop sufficient reverence for the world as we behold it – and to know that it is through such reverence that we can save it from ourselves, as well as most logically worship whatever its ultimate source may be, whether or not that ever-wondrous hope is sitting on a proximate cloud, overseeing our doings, or has long since departed to play planetary billiards in another universe.

Of course, there are intriguing subsidiary questions. What if the ultimate source of all we behold, finite but really quite fastastic, decided we ought to have enough intelligence to conduct our own lives, without constant supervision, as if we were deficient children?

Oh, my, don’t tell us we’re expected to function like responsible adults, while we let questions about God be answered as only silence amid the gifts and pangs of everyday life may answer them!

What? We're free to do as we like? Well, then, let's like what we do.

About The Author

Tom Attea, humorist and creator of http://NewsLaugh.com, has had six shows produced Off-Broadway. Critics have called his writing "delightfully funny," "witty," with "good, genuine laughs" and "great humor and ebullience."

The Invention of Water And Air Creatures; Part Six, The Invention of Everything, An Eyewitness Account

by: Tom Attea

Now, the stage was set. We had land, water, the sky, heat and light, and our first invention, a way for whatever creatures we would invent to reproduce and have a great time doing so. Now, we were ready to develop the actual creatures who would inhabit the invention. Today we were scheduled to start with the ones that would go in the water and air.

“I want to congratulate everybody for your work so far. It’s because of your dedication and contributions that we can now invent the creatures who will inhabit the universe. I understand you brought some prototypes.”

“Yes, I did. I thought some samples would be helpful.”

“Excellent. Is there any special way you’d like to proceed?”

“Actually, there is.”

“How so?”

“From the bottom up.”

“Where’s the bottom?”

“Didn’t we say the water would go where it’s low?”

“Yes, we did.”

“So what could be lower than the bottom of the water?”

“Not much, at least, as far as creatures are concerned.”

“Good. Then let’s follow your lead and start there. What do you have?”

“To get things started, hot water.”

“Way down there? I didn’t know the heat we’re putting way up in the sky would get down that far?”

“It doesn’t. This heat comes from way down under.”

“Can you elaborate?”

“Sure. When the original agglomerations we decided to call planets take shape, they’re really hot items. In fact, during the first few billion years or so, you wouldn’t want to sit down on one.”

“That hot, huh?”

“Enough to melt steel.”

“So what happens?”

“What else? Over the millennia, they cool down, I mean, at least on the surface, or else where are the creatures going to be comfortable?”

“Got ya.”

“I see where you’re going. There’s still heat toward the middle that finds its way out.”

“Right. And, of course, that leads to – “

“– hot water!”

“Which facilitates the socializing of the atoms and molecules.”

“Ah, ha! So we have a hot time in the old water tonight.”

“If you need to look at it that way. Anyway, the water’s boiling hot, the atoms and the molecules are rubbing up against each other and combining this way and that. And out of this really happening whirlpool bath of attraction and repulsion we get molecular couples, families, extended families, etc.”

“And then?”

“Eventually, they combine into creatures that are just right for the environment.”

“Got a name for that?”

“Yeah. We call it ‘Survival Of The Ones That Fit.’”

“Sounds right. Go on.”

“Mind if I go to the tank?”

“Please. But I’d like to move through this aspect of creatures. I’m looking forward to inventing the ones that go on land. I understand we plan to make some of them intelligent enough to understand a bit about what we plan to accomplish. ”

“Now, mustn’t jump ahead. The ones that go in the water and in the sky are every bit as important.”

“Fine. Tech will be tech. Go ahead.”

“Here we have something that actually lives under the bottom. “

“Under it?”

“What? You want to waste all that room?”

“No way. I want creatures wherever they can fit.”

“That’s the principle we’re working with down in the lab: maximum appropriate variety.”

“My sentiments exactly. What do you call that creature?”

“A sandworm. Of course, there are different kinds, but let’s just group them under the heading 'sandworms.'”

“Gotcha.”

“We’ve also got all kinds of sand bugs.”

“I might have guessed. I think we can allow you to work out the details on those. Just stay pretty much with six legs for all those whatchamacallits?"

"Insects. Will do. Mind if some can walk and fly?"

"Sounds like a good mix. What’s next?”

“Well, right here we have, as you’ll notice, a prototype that’s standing on the bottom without moving.”

“What do you call that?”

“Actually, we have two types. This green one that’s just standing around is a typical example of what we decided to call a plant, in this case, seaweed. But notice this other critter that’s just standing on the rock, waving it’s colorful arms. It may look like a plant, but actually it’s what we intend to call an animal.”

“No kidding? I thought only plants were just going to stand around?”

“That was the original concept, but we thought about it and decided, Hey, why not have some rudimentary creatures that just sort of stand around, too?”

“Seems that there should be a place for such creatures. How does that one function?”

“See the tiny wavy things?”

“Yeah.”

“They’re called cilia. We talked about those when we discussed reproduction. Remember?"

"Who could forget? I think we all enjoyed that session."

"Enabled the entire thing we're inventing. But go ahead."

"You might like to know that the name 'cilia" is derived from the irrepressible thought that, vital as they are, they can at times look a bit silly, waving away with no apparent reason. In this case, waving them is actually how the creature attracts food.”

“Food?”

“As you remember, all the creatures need energy. And food is the way they’re going to get it.”

“Got a name for the process by which it locates and intakes food?”

“Yeah. We call it ‘Natural Food Selection.’”

“All right! Like it!”

“Thanks. For short, we call it ‘eating.’”

“Understood. Please, continue.”

“What’s that other thing stuck to the bottom?”

“This item with the round hands over itself?”

“Yeah.”

“That’s the middle ground. It can attach itself to something but it can also crawl around.”

“What do you call it?”

“These we call clams and these mussels.”

“What’s the diff’?”

“Well, the word ‘clam’ refers to a defensive tactic. Watch when I move my finger toward it. See how it clams up?”

“Neato. What about the other term?”

“That covers the means of locomotion. Notice this one that's on the move. See. It pokes out of the shell and kind of muscles its way around.”

“Interesting concept. What’s that creature crawling around on the bottom?”

“We call that a lobster.”

“Why is that?”

“You see these sharp, two-fingered hands? They use them to lob food around. Ergo, lobsters.”

“How can something that moves that slow possibly get food?”

“The plan is it eats things that fall to the bottom.”

“Dead things?”

“I asked you not to use that word. Remember, anything that lives never dies. It just completes its life.”

“How about just “ends it’?”

“Whatever, as long as you don’t say ‘die.’ What an injustice to the whole process. As the creatures live, they save their lives. So they don’t just die. Got it?”

“Yes, boss. Sorry about that.”

“Please, go on.”

“OK. So this guy or gal just crawls around on the bottom and eats things that fall there.”

“You seem to have this part of the water pretty much under control. Can we move on from the bottom?”

“I have a few more things to cover.”

“Sounds like more detail work. Take care of it down in the lab.”

“No problem. Next, we have the things that get around by the process I noted at an earlier meeting, called ‘swimming.’ Anybody need a review?”

“I think we all remember. You can continue.”

“OK. See all these colorful little guys and gals. They’re what we call fish.”

“Fish?”

“Yeah. It’s a combo we worked out from the wish that we could come up with creatures that can move through the water really fast, even though it's quite thick, say, in comparison with air. So 'fast' plus ‘wish’ led to ‘fish.’"

"Works for me.”

“Me, too. And the fish swim?”

“Right.”

“Why only little ones?”

“We’re limited by how big a tank I could get in here.”

“Of course.”

“We're also working on a whale of a demo tank ."

"Good. Look forward to seeing your work as it evolves."

"Fortunately, the bigger ones function pretty much the same way as the little ones. For instance, see how they're wiggling their tails back and forth?”

“Yeah.”

“That’s the principle behind all of them, no matter how big they get.”

“I remember. They push the water this way and that with their tails and the water pushes back, so they go forward?”

“Right on, baby! Except when you get to most of the biggest creatures in the water.”

“What happens then?”

“They move their tails up and down. We thought it was a necessary variation.”

“I’ll go along with that. You were talking about developing a way for the creatures in the water to breathe. How’d you manage that?”

“Gil had an insight, so we call it gills. Let me take this little fella out and demonstrate for a moment. Excuse me, he’s kind of feisty. Got ya! OK, now look here. See these little red things just behind its head.”

“Yeah. Those the gills?”

“Right.”

“How do they work?”

“The fish uses its mouth and these flaps to move water over them, and the little red wonders nip out the O2 and give back CO2.”

“Which the plants in the water can’t wait to breathe in?”

“Exactamundo! Now, I can go into detail as long as you want me to, but that’s basically what happens in the water. Just let me remind you about the stuff that floats on it. Remember plankton?”

“Who could forget? We know. Elemental teamwork with the creatures that breathe in O2 and breathe out CO2. It breathes in CO2 and sends out O2.”

“Right. A lot, too, because there's going to be a lot of it. ”

“So let me recap. The whole shebang starts in hot water. Then we get creatures that inhabit every possible nook and cranny that can support them – under the bottom, on the bottom, above the bottom, and right on top. Am I right?”

“That about covers it. Of course, as the atoms and molecules respond, they can create quite an array of creatures. Our thoughts are still taking shape but overall we plan to provide for a perfectly flexible response, which, of course, would lead to perfectly appropriate variety. At least, that’s the plan. All the life that fits. ”

“Excellent. So have we covered the water creatures sufficiently?”

“Almost. We still have to talk about the creatures that swim on top of it and fly over it. That, of course, brings us to the air creatures. ”

“What do you call those?”

“Collectively, birds. These we named water birds.”

“They can actually float on the water and fly up into the sky? How so?”

“Let me move to the birdcage. Excuse me. I put this cover on them to keep them quiet. See. The plan is that they develop these big flat hands that they wave back and forth. In the process, they beat against the air and the air beats back.”

“Sort of like the way swimming works?”

“Yeah, only a lighter take on it.”

“But how do they stay up there? Looks like a pretty plump critter just to be flitting around in the sky.”

“That was a real brain teaser. But we finally realized two things. First, we could give the air creatures hollow bones, which would be much lighter.”

“Good thought.”

“Yeah, but it still wasn’t quite enough. The thick hair that was intended to keep them warm weighed them down.”

“What hair? I don't see any of the usual type. ”

“I see you noticed. We developed this special kind of hair that would be lighter. “

“Interesting. But how so lighter? The strands look much thicker.”

“Yeah, but the main part is hollow.”

“Like the bones?”

“Right. We call them feathers.”

“Feathers, as in?”

“Flying in all kinds of weather.”

“Makes sense. I assume at some point they get tired of flying around?"

"Yes, they do."

"What do they do at that point."

"Land."

"I know we have land. I mean, what do they do? Come down onto the land?"

"Or the water. Either one. Oh, I should mention where they eat."

"I assume when they're not flying around?"

"Not necessarily. Remember I said we had bugs that go under the bottom of the water. Well, we also have bugs that go just about everywhere."

"Don't tell me, even in the sky?"

"Yeah. Wherever the little buggers can find a livable niche."

"And the birds can catch them even when they're both flying around?"

"Yeah. The aeronautical math was a bit challenging, but we were able to work out how the bird and the bug could intersect, even when the bug was doing everything possible to avoid the conjunction. Of course, life won't always be that challenging. The birds and the bugs will also be able to alight here and there and chow down."

"Sounds advisable. Anything else?”

Well, at some point we have to get creatures onto the land, and we thought, Wow, why not tap into the creatures that are already in the water?”

“Seems like the right tactic. But I think that moves us into the next meeting – the land creatures. Agreed?”

“Yep.”

“Inspired work. Really. Tell the people in tech I commend them."

"Thanks. I'll be sure to forward you compliment."

"Seems to me we now have a good handle on creatures that go in the water and the sky. Let’s adjourn for today. Tomorrow, we do the land creatures.”

So now we had made the big transition from setting the stage to starting to populate it. We had the water and the sky behind us, and the land creatures were just ahead. I kept wondering, What could go on the land that’s different from what we invented to go in the water and the sky? Oh, I suppose the unique attributes of life on land would do a lot to guide our thinking.

About The Author

Tom Attea, humorist and creator of http://NewsLaugh.com, has had six shows produced Off-Broadway. Critics have called his writing "delightfully funny," "witty," with "good, genuine laughs" and "great humor and ebullience."

After Election Debate, Emergency Medics Labor To Uncross Hillary Clinton’s Fingers

by: Tom Attea

In a recent debate with her Republican opponent in the race for the Senate, Hillary Clinton was repeatedly challenged about her presidential ambitions and accused of inattention to her duties as a Senator from New York. Ever unruffled, she maintained that she is very much focused on her work as a Senator and, crossing her fingers, insisted that she has not yet made a decision to run for the presidency.

The debate did go on and Senator Clinton, who may still experience some constraints against outright lying, kept her fingers crossed during the entire event. As a result, she was surprised to discover immediately after leaving the podium that she simply could not uncross her digits.

Alarmed, she asked to be driven to the emergency room of New York hospital, where doctors labored to uncross her painfully locked fingers. Finally, success was at hand and she was released.

Holding up her newly freed index and middle fingers, she told the press, which had gathered outside of the emergency room, “See! I’m cured. And I can say, without crossing my fingers, that, at this very moment, I have no presidential ambitions whatsoever!”

On the way home, however, she confided to an informant that she was only speaking about her intentions upon exiting the emergency room and would feel completely free after November 8th to talk about her presidential ambitions without having to cross her fingers even once.

About The Author

Tom Attea, humorist and creator of http://NewsLaugh.com, has had six shows produced Off-Broadway. Critics have called his writing "delightfully funny," "witty," with "good, genuine laughs" and "great humor and ebullience."

New Bush Tactic On “Stay The Course” In Iraq: “Don’t Say It; Just Stay It.”

by: Tom Attea

The press was abuzz with the news that President Bush has dropped the dumb saying in regard to Iraq that America will “stay the course.” Unfortunately, almost all other comments emanating from the oval office indicate that he intends to keep the same dumb strategy.

In other words, with political pressures mounting as the November wakeup call draws nigh, the administration seems to have arrived at the politically expedient policy, “Don’t say it; just stay it.”

Oh, there has been a certain amount of obliging talk by the administration about drawing up benchmarks for such woefully overdue items as the reduction of violence and the turnover of peacekeeping duties to the Iraqis. But Donald Rumsfeld, being the exact speaker that he unavoidably is, preferred the term “park benches” and noted that under such languorous conditions specific dates are impractical.

Apparently, put on the defensive by the talk, indeterminate as it was, Prime Minister al-Maliki felt compelled to announce, "I am a friend of the United States, but I am not in the United States. If I was, I would agree to any timetable whatsoever.”

In order to draw a curtain across any appearance of disagreement with the Maliki government, Bush announced, “Prime Minister Maliki is the leader of a sovereign nation, and as such he doesn’t have to lick anybody’s butt but mine.”

The only timetable with any urgency in it is coming from the beleaguered Iraqi citizens themselves. Two recent polls show that the majority of them think the sooner our troops hit the trail, the sooner the violence will subside.

As a result, changing not only what we say but what we do doesn’t mean we’re going to “cut and run,” the other baseball bat the administration uses to beat Democrats over the head with. We’re merely giving the Iraqis a chance to determine their own destiny.

Of course, al-Qaeda in and out of Iraq, as well as arms supplier and hopeful co-ruler Iran, will murder or assist in the murder of as many Iraqis as they can to help speed up the illusive timetable.

But we finally have to trust the Iraqi people. They have voted for their own self-determination and now they have an even greater reason to fight for it. They’re out from under the foot of Saddam Hussein.

Now, if they can only get their own act together and drive the foreign elements out, they can have a peaceful, prosperous, and democratically determined nation for the first time in modern history, that is, if they have the sense to want one.

About The Author

Tom Attea, humorist and creator of http://NewsLaugh.com, has had six shows produced Off-Broadway. Critics have called his writing "delightfully funny," "witty," with "good, genuine laughs" and "great humor and ebullience."

New Government Study Fails To Locate Mexicans Who Know What A Ladder Is

by: Tom Attea

An extensive study by the U. S. government of Mexicans hoping to enter America illegally has concluded that not a single one of them knows what a ladder is.This key finding has given impetus to funding for extensions of the border fence between America and Mexico.

As President Bush noted, “Today is a lucky day for America. We have learned that aspiring illegal immigrants cannot resort to ladders, because they never heard of them. So all we need is a fence that’s too high to jump over.”

He then inked a bill authorizing 700 more miles of fence along the U. S. and Mexican border.

Yet there were troubling findings. For instance, customs and Border Protection statistics reveal that apprehensions at border crossings are down 8% nationally but up in the San Diego sector, an area that has the most fencing.

Of course, this discovery provokes the question, How can the illegal immigrants be getting past it?

A special government task force will look into the matter. Members will be equipped with binoculars for both day and night vision so they can determine just how the Mexicans are defeating the fence. Possible explanations are tunneling and pole vaulting.

Regardless of what the watchdogs discover, we cannot but return to one of the most asinine instances of misjudgment in the history of the nation. We build one factory after another to take advantage of the cheap labor in communist China, while we ignore the cheap labor in a democracy on the other side of our own border. Not to mention the cheap labor in all of South America.

Instead of being the leading economic benefactor in our own hemisphere, we have chosen to expend the majority of our money proving that a repressive communist nation on the other side of the globe can achieve astonishing economic success with the open wallet of the leading capitalist country.

The perception is enough to make you walk up to the wall and bang your forehead against it. But that would be counterproductive. Obviously, America needs all the brains it can get.

About The Author

Tom Attea, humorist and creator of http://NewsLaugh.com, has had six shows produced Off-Broadway. Critics have called his writing "delightfully funny," "witty," with "good, genuine laughs" and "great humor and ebullience."

Communists Sell North Korea And Iran “The Noose To Hang Themselves With”

by: Tom Attea

Remember Lenin’s quip that “The capitalists would sell us the noose to hang them with”? Talk about the inevitability of history. Now the statement seems to apply more to the communists.

When UN sanctions went into effect against North Korean, Beijing vowed to enforce them, at least, as much they vow to enforce anything other than repression of their own people’s freedoms. Remember how atwitter Condi Rice was about China’s willingness?

But a look along its border with Kim Jong IL’s potentate’s paradise reveals that goods and services are passing the Chinese boarder guards as freely as they did before sanctions were imposed. And to think that we expected China to forgo profit for principles, when it has obviously attached itself to the principle that the best way to defeat the capitalists is to do business better than they do.

One of the more notable ironies is that, while America is the most forthrightly feisty about imposing sanctions, and the heck with the economic liabilities we incur, China is a lot closer to North Korea than we are.

A similar rony applies to our advocacy of sanctions against Iran, while formerly communist Russia, as a trading partner with the mighty mullahs, resists. The cynically calculating Putin is puttin’ on blinders even though Iran is just next door.

The only voice that seems willing to call a nuke a nuke is Ehud Olmert of Israel, who came out squarely against Iran’s possession of nuclear power. While he doesn’t have anything to lose in terms of trade, at least, he’s able to appreciate how close he is Iran and what Iran’s president has repeatedly voiced about his hope for Israel to be “wiped off the map.”

Meanwhile, think how upset the fiery communist Lenin would be if he knew about all the hanky panky by communists present and past. It would be enough to make him sit up and bang his head on the lid of his glass coffin.

About The Author

Tom Attea, humorist and creator of http://NewsLaugh.com, has had six shows produced Off-Broadway. Critics have called his writing "delightfully funny," "witty," with "good, genuine laughs" and "great humor and ebullience."

Politicians Now Have Clean Hands; Rectitude Not Required

by: Tom Attea

Now, even the most nefarious politicians have clean hands. Just ask them and they’ll show them to you. How is that possible? Have they all suddenly been overcome by moral rectitude?

Not at all. While we’re free to tell ourselves such a fairytale, the surprising feat is due entirely to the wide use of hand disinfectant.

It seems that politicians have discovered the germ theory of disease. They know if they go out and shake a multitude of hands, they’re likely to get cold and flu germs on them and who knows what else.

“Good stuff, keeps you from getting colds,” President Bush raved. “I even use it after I touch my wife.”

So it appears that now most politicians are they’re taking the precaution of scrubbing their hands with disinfectant immediately after every glad-handing event.

A favorite user is Dick Cheney, who, as we all know, has hands that are saintly clean, even without disinfectant. Just ask him.

Of course, there are politicians who are disaffected with the entire practice. They think it shows disrespect for voters and prevents candidates from experiencing the joys of human contact.

“It’s condescending to the voters,” Governor Bill Richardson of New Mexico, who, it seems holds the Guinness Book of World Records mark for shaking the most hands within one eight-hour period. “The great part about politics is that you’re touching humanity,” he maintains. “You’re going to collect bacteria just by existing.”

It seems we still have a while to wait for a disinfectant that will clean up dirty politics.

About The Author

Tom Attea, humorist and creator of http://NewsLaugh.com, has had six shows produced Off-Broadway. Critics have called his writing "delightfully funny," "witty," with "good, genuine laughs" and "great humor and ebullience."