Rabu, 20 Agustus 2008

"The God Delusion" By Richard Dawkins. Philosophical Fiddling While Rome Burns

by: Tom Attea

While the world goes its self-destructive way – not entirely because humans differ in their beliefs about the nature of and existence or nonexistence of God – we have yet another book by a contemporary philosopher, riffling through the dusty bones of ancient arguments that can never be settled, because one opinion supported by inconclusive evidence can never disprove another opinion supported by inconclusive evidence.

The author, the widely known skeptic Richard Dawkins, chooses to take easy potshots at the traditional concept of God as presented in the Bible, the tribal tapestry of which contains threads that cannot, understandably enough, be neatly sorted out by logical analysis.

He also goes on to deal with the usual proofs presented by theologians for the existence of God – first trotted out by Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theologica, the Aristotelian riff in which he famously argued backward from his forgone conclusions.

But now let’s skip to a few questions that actually matter.

Is the philosophical urgency of the day about the nature of, existence or non-existence of God? Can we, the grumbling creatures of finitude, even credibly analyze such enormous questions? Or are we left to sustain our beliefs, pro or con, with a leap to faith, the precipice remaining unspecified?

Now, let’s stop fooling around and ask the most consequential question. Does the peace of the world and our survival depend on resolving the ancient logical conundrums about the nature and existence of God?

It seems to us that even a country bumpkin sitting on his porch, noshing on a sprout of homegrown wheat, would realize that the far more urgent question is how the human race can be encouraged to develop sufficient reverence for the world as we behold it – and to know that it is through such reverence that we can save it from ourselves, as well as most logically worship whatever its ultimate source may be, whether or not that ever-wondrous hope is sitting on a proximate cloud, overseeing our doings, or has long since departed to play planetary billiards in another universe.

Of course, there are intriguing subsidiary questions. What if the ultimate source of all we behold, finite but really quite fastastic, decided we ought to have enough intelligence to conduct our own lives, without constant supervision, as if we were deficient children?

Oh, my, don’t tell us we’re expected to function like responsible adults, while we let questions about God be answered as only silence amid the gifts and pangs of everyday life may answer them!

What? We're free to do as we like? Well, then, let's like what we do.

About The Author

Tom Attea, humorist and creator of http://NewsLaugh.com, has had six shows produced Off-Broadway. Critics have called his writing "delightfully funny," "witty," with "good, genuine laughs" and "great humor and ebullience."

The Invention of Water And Air Creatures; Part Six, The Invention of Everything, An Eyewitness Account

by: Tom Attea

Now, the stage was set. We had land, water, the sky, heat and light, and our first invention, a way for whatever creatures we would invent to reproduce and have a great time doing so. Now, we were ready to develop the actual creatures who would inhabit the invention. Today we were scheduled to start with the ones that would go in the water and air.

“I want to congratulate everybody for your work so far. It’s because of your dedication and contributions that we can now invent the creatures who will inhabit the universe. I understand you brought some prototypes.”

“Yes, I did. I thought some samples would be helpful.”

“Excellent. Is there any special way you’d like to proceed?”

“Actually, there is.”

“How so?”

“From the bottom up.”

“Where’s the bottom?”

“Didn’t we say the water would go where it’s low?”

“Yes, we did.”

“So what could be lower than the bottom of the water?”

“Not much, at least, as far as creatures are concerned.”

“Good. Then let’s follow your lead and start there. What do you have?”

“To get things started, hot water.”

“Way down there? I didn’t know the heat we’re putting way up in the sky would get down that far?”

“It doesn’t. This heat comes from way down under.”

“Can you elaborate?”

“Sure. When the original agglomerations we decided to call planets take shape, they’re really hot items. In fact, during the first few billion years or so, you wouldn’t want to sit down on one.”

“That hot, huh?”

“Enough to melt steel.”

“So what happens?”

“What else? Over the millennia, they cool down, I mean, at least on the surface, or else where are the creatures going to be comfortable?”

“Got ya.”

“I see where you’re going. There’s still heat toward the middle that finds its way out.”

“Right. And, of course, that leads to – “

“– hot water!”

“Which facilitates the socializing of the atoms and molecules.”

“Ah, ha! So we have a hot time in the old water tonight.”

“If you need to look at it that way. Anyway, the water’s boiling hot, the atoms and the molecules are rubbing up against each other and combining this way and that. And out of this really happening whirlpool bath of attraction and repulsion we get molecular couples, families, extended families, etc.”

“And then?”

“Eventually, they combine into creatures that are just right for the environment.”

“Got a name for that?”

“Yeah. We call it ‘Survival Of The Ones That Fit.’”

“Sounds right. Go on.”

“Mind if I go to the tank?”

“Please. But I’d like to move through this aspect of creatures. I’m looking forward to inventing the ones that go on land. I understand we plan to make some of them intelligent enough to understand a bit about what we plan to accomplish. ”

“Now, mustn’t jump ahead. The ones that go in the water and in the sky are every bit as important.”

“Fine. Tech will be tech. Go ahead.”

“Here we have something that actually lives under the bottom. “

“Under it?”

“What? You want to waste all that room?”

“No way. I want creatures wherever they can fit.”

“That’s the principle we’re working with down in the lab: maximum appropriate variety.”

“My sentiments exactly. What do you call that creature?”

“A sandworm. Of course, there are different kinds, but let’s just group them under the heading 'sandworms.'”

“Gotcha.”

“We’ve also got all kinds of sand bugs.”

“I might have guessed. I think we can allow you to work out the details on those. Just stay pretty much with six legs for all those whatchamacallits?"

"Insects. Will do. Mind if some can walk and fly?"

"Sounds like a good mix. What’s next?”

“Well, right here we have, as you’ll notice, a prototype that’s standing on the bottom without moving.”

“What do you call that?”

“Actually, we have two types. This green one that’s just standing around is a typical example of what we decided to call a plant, in this case, seaweed. But notice this other critter that’s just standing on the rock, waving it’s colorful arms. It may look like a plant, but actually it’s what we intend to call an animal.”

“No kidding? I thought only plants were just going to stand around?”

“That was the original concept, but we thought about it and decided, Hey, why not have some rudimentary creatures that just sort of stand around, too?”

“Seems that there should be a place for such creatures. How does that one function?”

“See the tiny wavy things?”

“Yeah.”

“They’re called cilia. We talked about those when we discussed reproduction. Remember?"

"Who could forget? I think we all enjoyed that session."

"Enabled the entire thing we're inventing. But go ahead."

"You might like to know that the name 'cilia" is derived from the irrepressible thought that, vital as they are, they can at times look a bit silly, waving away with no apparent reason. In this case, waving them is actually how the creature attracts food.”

“Food?”

“As you remember, all the creatures need energy. And food is the way they’re going to get it.”

“Got a name for the process by which it locates and intakes food?”

“Yeah. We call it ‘Natural Food Selection.’”

“All right! Like it!”

“Thanks. For short, we call it ‘eating.’”

“Understood. Please, continue.”

“What’s that other thing stuck to the bottom?”

“This item with the round hands over itself?”

“Yeah.”

“That’s the middle ground. It can attach itself to something but it can also crawl around.”

“What do you call it?”

“These we call clams and these mussels.”

“What’s the diff’?”

“Well, the word ‘clam’ refers to a defensive tactic. Watch when I move my finger toward it. See how it clams up?”

“Neato. What about the other term?”

“That covers the means of locomotion. Notice this one that's on the move. See. It pokes out of the shell and kind of muscles its way around.”

“Interesting concept. What’s that creature crawling around on the bottom?”

“We call that a lobster.”

“Why is that?”

“You see these sharp, two-fingered hands? They use them to lob food around. Ergo, lobsters.”

“How can something that moves that slow possibly get food?”

“The plan is it eats things that fall to the bottom.”

“Dead things?”

“I asked you not to use that word. Remember, anything that lives never dies. It just completes its life.”

“How about just “ends it’?”

“Whatever, as long as you don’t say ‘die.’ What an injustice to the whole process. As the creatures live, they save their lives. So they don’t just die. Got it?”

“Yes, boss. Sorry about that.”

“Please, go on.”

“OK. So this guy or gal just crawls around on the bottom and eats things that fall there.”

“You seem to have this part of the water pretty much under control. Can we move on from the bottom?”

“I have a few more things to cover.”

“Sounds like more detail work. Take care of it down in the lab.”

“No problem. Next, we have the things that get around by the process I noted at an earlier meeting, called ‘swimming.’ Anybody need a review?”

“I think we all remember. You can continue.”

“OK. See all these colorful little guys and gals. They’re what we call fish.”

“Fish?”

“Yeah. It’s a combo we worked out from the wish that we could come up with creatures that can move through the water really fast, even though it's quite thick, say, in comparison with air. So 'fast' plus ‘wish’ led to ‘fish.’"

"Works for me.”

“Me, too. And the fish swim?”

“Right.”

“Why only little ones?”

“We’re limited by how big a tank I could get in here.”

“Of course.”

“We're also working on a whale of a demo tank ."

"Good. Look forward to seeing your work as it evolves."

"Fortunately, the bigger ones function pretty much the same way as the little ones. For instance, see how they're wiggling their tails back and forth?”

“Yeah.”

“That’s the principle behind all of them, no matter how big they get.”

“I remember. They push the water this way and that with their tails and the water pushes back, so they go forward?”

“Right on, baby! Except when you get to most of the biggest creatures in the water.”

“What happens then?”

“They move their tails up and down. We thought it was a necessary variation.”

“I’ll go along with that. You were talking about developing a way for the creatures in the water to breathe. How’d you manage that?”

“Gil had an insight, so we call it gills. Let me take this little fella out and demonstrate for a moment. Excuse me, he’s kind of feisty. Got ya! OK, now look here. See these little red things just behind its head.”

“Yeah. Those the gills?”

“Right.”

“How do they work?”

“The fish uses its mouth and these flaps to move water over them, and the little red wonders nip out the O2 and give back CO2.”

“Which the plants in the water can’t wait to breathe in?”

“Exactamundo! Now, I can go into detail as long as you want me to, but that’s basically what happens in the water. Just let me remind you about the stuff that floats on it. Remember plankton?”

“Who could forget? We know. Elemental teamwork with the creatures that breathe in O2 and breathe out CO2. It breathes in CO2 and sends out O2.”

“Right. A lot, too, because there's going to be a lot of it. ”

“So let me recap. The whole shebang starts in hot water. Then we get creatures that inhabit every possible nook and cranny that can support them – under the bottom, on the bottom, above the bottom, and right on top. Am I right?”

“That about covers it. Of course, as the atoms and molecules respond, they can create quite an array of creatures. Our thoughts are still taking shape but overall we plan to provide for a perfectly flexible response, which, of course, would lead to perfectly appropriate variety. At least, that’s the plan. All the life that fits. ”

“Excellent. So have we covered the water creatures sufficiently?”

“Almost. We still have to talk about the creatures that swim on top of it and fly over it. That, of course, brings us to the air creatures. ”

“What do you call those?”

“Collectively, birds. These we named water birds.”

“They can actually float on the water and fly up into the sky? How so?”

“Let me move to the birdcage. Excuse me. I put this cover on them to keep them quiet. See. The plan is that they develop these big flat hands that they wave back and forth. In the process, they beat against the air and the air beats back.”

“Sort of like the way swimming works?”

“Yeah, only a lighter take on it.”

“But how do they stay up there? Looks like a pretty plump critter just to be flitting around in the sky.”

“That was a real brain teaser. But we finally realized two things. First, we could give the air creatures hollow bones, which would be much lighter.”

“Good thought.”

“Yeah, but it still wasn’t quite enough. The thick hair that was intended to keep them warm weighed them down.”

“What hair? I don't see any of the usual type. ”

“I see you noticed. We developed this special kind of hair that would be lighter. “

“Interesting. But how so lighter? The strands look much thicker.”

“Yeah, but the main part is hollow.”

“Like the bones?”

“Right. We call them feathers.”

“Feathers, as in?”

“Flying in all kinds of weather.”

“Makes sense. I assume at some point they get tired of flying around?"

"Yes, they do."

"What do they do at that point."

"Land."

"I know we have land. I mean, what do they do? Come down onto the land?"

"Or the water. Either one. Oh, I should mention where they eat."

"I assume when they're not flying around?"

"Not necessarily. Remember I said we had bugs that go under the bottom of the water. Well, we also have bugs that go just about everywhere."

"Don't tell me, even in the sky?"

"Yeah. Wherever the little buggers can find a livable niche."

"And the birds can catch them even when they're both flying around?"

"Yeah. The aeronautical math was a bit challenging, but we were able to work out how the bird and the bug could intersect, even when the bug was doing everything possible to avoid the conjunction. Of course, life won't always be that challenging. The birds and the bugs will also be able to alight here and there and chow down."

"Sounds advisable. Anything else?”

Well, at some point we have to get creatures onto the land, and we thought, Wow, why not tap into the creatures that are already in the water?”

“Seems like the right tactic. But I think that moves us into the next meeting – the land creatures. Agreed?”

“Yep.”

“Inspired work. Really. Tell the people in tech I commend them."

"Thanks. I'll be sure to forward you compliment."

"Seems to me we now have a good handle on creatures that go in the water and the sky. Let’s adjourn for today. Tomorrow, we do the land creatures.”

So now we had made the big transition from setting the stage to starting to populate it. We had the water and the sky behind us, and the land creatures were just ahead. I kept wondering, What could go on the land that’s different from what we invented to go in the water and the sky? Oh, I suppose the unique attributes of life on land would do a lot to guide our thinking.

About The Author

Tom Attea, humorist and creator of http://NewsLaugh.com, has had six shows produced Off-Broadway. Critics have called his writing "delightfully funny," "witty," with "good, genuine laughs" and "great humor and ebullience."

After Election Debate, Emergency Medics Labor To Uncross Hillary Clinton’s Fingers

by: Tom Attea

In a recent debate with her Republican opponent in the race for the Senate, Hillary Clinton was repeatedly challenged about her presidential ambitions and accused of inattention to her duties as a Senator from New York. Ever unruffled, she maintained that she is very much focused on her work as a Senator and, crossing her fingers, insisted that she has not yet made a decision to run for the presidency.

The debate did go on and Senator Clinton, who may still experience some constraints against outright lying, kept her fingers crossed during the entire event. As a result, she was surprised to discover immediately after leaving the podium that she simply could not uncross her digits.

Alarmed, she asked to be driven to the emergency room of New York hospital, where doctors labored to uncross her painfully locked fingers. Finally, success was at hand and she was released.

Holding up her newly freed index and middle fingers, she told the press, which had gathered outside of the emergency room, “See! I’m cured. And I can say, without crossing my fingers, that, at this very moment, I have no presidential ambitions whatsoever!”

On the way home, however, she confided to an informant that she was only speaking about her intentions upon exiting the emergency room and would feel completely free after November 8th to talk about her presidential ambitions without having to cross her fingers even once.

About The Author

Tom Attea, humorist and creator of http://NewsLaugh.com, has had six shows produced Off-Broadway. Critics have called his writing "delightfully funny," "witty," with "good, genuine laughs" and "great humor and ebullience."

New Bush Tactic On “Stay The Course” In Iraq: “Don’t Say It; Just Stay It.”

by: Tom Attea

The press was abuzz with the news that President Bush has dropped the dumb saying in regard to Iraq that America will “stay the course.” Unfortunately, almost all other comments emanating from the oval office indicate that he intends to keep the same dumb strategy.

In other words, with political pressures mounting as the November wakeup call draws nigh, the administration seems to have arrived at the politically expedient policy, “Don’t say it; just stay it.”

Oh, there has been a certain amount of obliging talk by the administration about drawing up benchmarks for such woefully overdue items as the reduction of violence and the turnover of peacekeeping duties to the Iraqis. But Donald Rumsfeld, being the exact speaker that he unavoidably is, preferred the term “park benches” and noted that under such languorous conditions specific dates are impractical.

Apparently, put on the defensive by the talk, indeterminate as it was, Prime Minister al-Maliki felt compelled to announce, "I am a friend of the United States, but I am not in the United States. If I was, I would agree to any timetable whatsoever.”

In order to draw a curtain across any appearance of disagreement with the Maliki government, Bush announced, “Prime Minister Maliki is the leader of a sovereign nation, and as such he doesn’t have to lick anybody’s butt but mine.”

The only timetable with any urgency in it is coming from the beleaguered Iraqi citizens themselves. Two recent polls show that the majority of them think the sooner our troops hit the trail, the sooner the violence will subside.

As a result, changing not only what we say but what we do doesn’t mean we’re going to “cut and run,” the other baseball bat the administration uses to beat Democrats over the head with. We’re merely giving the Iraqis a chance to determine their own destiny.

Of course, al-Qaeda in and out of Iraq, as well as arms supplier and hopeful co-ruler Iran, will murder or assist in the murder of as many Iraqis as they can to help speed up the illusive timetable.

But we finally have to trust the Iraqi people. They have voted for their own self-determination and now they have an even greater reason to fight for it. They’re out from under the foot of Saddam Hussein.

Now, if they can only get their own act together and drive the foreign elements out, they can have a peaceful, prosperous, and democratically determined nation for the first time in modern history, that is, if they have the sense to want one.

About The Author

Tom Attea, humorist and creator of http://NewsLaugh.com, has had six shows produced Off-Broadway. Critics have called his writing "delightfully funny," "witty," with "good, genuine laughs" and "great humor and ebullience."

New Government Study Fails To Locate Mexicans Who Know What A Ladder Is

by: Tom Attea

An extensive study by the U. S. government of Mexicans hoping to enter America illegally has concluded that not a single one of them knows what a ladder is.This key finding has given impetus to funding for extensions of the border fence between America and Mexico.

As President Bush noted, “Today is a lucky day for America. We have learned that aspiring illegal immigrants cannot resort to ladders, because they never heard of them. So all we need is a fence that’s too high to jump over.”

He then inked a bill authorizing 700 more miles of fence along the U. S. and Mexican border.

Yet there were troubling findings. For instance, customs and Border Protection statistics reveal that apprehensions at border crossings are down 8% nationally but up in the San Diego sector, an area that has the most fencing.

Of course, this discovery provokes the question, How can the illegal immigrants be getting past it?

A special government task force will look into the matter. Members will be equipped with binoculars for both day and night vision so they can determine just how the Mexicans are defeating the fence. Possible explanations are tunneling and pole vaulting.

Regardless of what the watchdogs discover, we cannot but return to one of the most asinine instances of misjudgment in the history of the nation. We build one factory after another to take advantage of the cheap labor in communist China, while we ignore the cheap labor in a democracy on the other side of our own border. Not to mention the cheap labor in all of South America.

Instead of being the leading economic benefactor in our own hemisphere, we have chosen to expend the majority of our money proving that a repressive communist nation on the other side of the globe can achieve astonishing economic success with the open wallet of the leading capitalist country.

The perception is enough to make you walk up to the wall and bang your forehead against it. But that would be counterproductive. Obviously, America needs all the brains it can get.

About The Author

Tom Attea, humorist and creator of http://NewsLaugh.com, has had six shows produced Off-Broadway. Critics have called his writing "delightfully funny," "witty," with "good, genuine laughs" and "great humor and ebullience."

Communists Sell North Korea And Iran “The Noose To Hang Themselves With”

by: Tom Attea

Remember Lenin’s quip that “The capitalists would sell us the noose to hang them with”? Talk about the inevitability of history. Now the statement seems to apply more to the communists.

When UN sanctions went into effect against North Korean, Beijing vowed to enforce them, at least, as much they vow to enforce anything other than repression of their own people’s freedoms. Remember how atwitter Condi Rice was about China’s willingness?

But a look along its border with Kim Jong IL’s potentate’s paradise reveals that goods and services are passing the Chinese boarder guards as freely as they did before sanctions were imposed. And to think that we expected China to forgo profit for principles, when it has obviously attached itself to the principle that the best way to defeat the capitalists is to do business better than they do.

One of the more notable ironies is that, while America is the most forthrightly feisty about imposing sanctions, and the heck with the economic liabilities we incur, China is a lot closer to North Korea than we are.

A similar rony applies to our advocacy of sanctions against Iran, while formerly communist Russia, as a trading partner with the mighty mullahs, resists. The cynically calculating Putin is puttin’ on blinders even though Iran is just next door.

The only voice that seems willing to call a nuke a nuke is Ehud Olmert of Israel, who came out squarely against Iran’s possession of nuclear power. While he doesn’t have anything to lose in terms of trade, at least, he’s able to appreciate how close he is Iran and what Iran’s president has repeatedly voiced about his hope for Israel to be “wiped off the map.”

Meanwhile, think how upset the fiery communist Lenin would be if he knew about all the hanky panky by communists present and past. It would be enough to make him sit up and bang his head on the lid of his glass coffin.

About The Author

Tom Attea, humorist and creator of http://NewsLaugh.com, has had six shows produced Off-Broadway. Critics have called his writing "delightfully funny," "witty," with "good, genuine laughs" and "great humor and ebullience."

Politicians Now Have Clean Hands; Rectitude Not Required

by: Tom Attea

Now, even the most nefarious politicians have clean hands. Just ask them and they’ll show them to you. How is that possible? Have they all suddenly been overcome by moral rectitude?

Not at all. While we’re free to tell ourselves such a fairytale, the surprising feat is due entirely to the wide use of hand disinfectant.

It seems that politicians have discovered the germ theory of disease. They know if they go out and shake a multitude of hands, they’re likely to get cold and flu germs on them and who knows what else.

“Good stuff, keeps you from getting colds,” President Bush raved. “I even use it after I touch my wife.”

So it appears that now most politicians are they’re taking the precaution of scrubbing their hands with disinfectant immediately after every glad-handing event.

A favorite user is Dick Cheney, who, as we all know, has hands that are saintly clean, even without disinfectant. Just ask him.

Of course, there are politicians who are disaffected with the entire practice. They think it shows disrespect for voters and prevents candidates from experiencing the joys of human contact.

“It’s condescending to the voters,” Governor Bill Richardson of New Mexico, who, it seems holds the Guinness Book of World Records mark for shaking the most hands within one eight-hour period. “The great part about politics is that you’re touching humanity,” he maintains. “You’re going to collect bacteria just by existing.”

It seems we still have a while to wait for a disinfectant that will clean up dirty politics.

About The Author

Tom Attea, humorist and creator of http://NewsLaugh.com, has had six shows produced Off-Broadway. Critics have called his writing "delightfully funny," "witty," with "good, genuine laughs" and "great humor and ebullience."

The Invention of Details, With A Final Q & A Period - Second Half;The Invention of Everything

by: Tom Attea


“Really?”

“Yeah. We figure, why make the creatures think about the billions of things that will be going on to keep them alive. We want to free them up to think about their lives, do things they actually want to do, and, my favorite subject, think about and discover the given.”

“The given?”

“What the universe is made of, how it works, etc.”

“Now, of course, you’re referring to the creatures who become scientists?”

“Yeah. They’re going to have a great time, trying to figure out all we put into this thing.”

“What else are the creatures going to think about?”

“I think we have to deal with the hard question.”

“Which is?”

“Well, the smartest creatures are going to realize they don’t last forever. How is that going to affect them?”

“Hmm, good question.”

“I think they should just do what my grandmother always told me and that’s to count their blessings.”

“Yeah, but that only goes so far. Put yourself in their position. You love another creature. Then the creature you love – “

“– careful now. Do not use the word I disapprove of, whatever you do.”

“Yes, sir. The other creature completes his or her life. What do you think? Happy, sad?”

“I’m surprised you’d ask. No way we want to invent creatures who would be happy at a time like that. How insensitive would that be? I would want creatures who would feel sad.”

“Me, too. But not forever.”

“Fine. But now let’s face up to the question in a general sense. How do they deal with the realization that none of them is going to live forever.”

“Well, let’s talk about that. Seems to me if they’re smart enough to consider such a question, they’re also smart enough to figure out the choices we had to make.”

“In what sense?”

“If every creature lived forever, how long would it take for the planet to fill up? After all, there’s only so much space.”

“Right. So pretty soon there wouldn’t be any room for new creatures.”

“Exactly. So I think realizing that should help them understand the overall idea we’re going with.”

“Which is?”

“Lifespans – for creatures, planets, whatever.”

“You mean, everything gets a certain share of the whole life of the universe?”

“Right. And if you value it – “

“– Hey, right. That’s it!”

“What?”

“The way they’ll finally be able to think.”

“Go on.”

“If they value life enough, they’ll know what a great thing it is to be part of, even if just for part of the whole thing.”

“Sounds like a reasonable conclusion to me.”

“Right. They’d realize some life is better than none. In fact, that it’s pretty fantastic, even if it can’t last forever.”

“Makes a tremendous amount of sense to me. How much of a share do you think each creature should have? Want to set an amount?”

“Seems kind of stiff and unnatural to me. What do you say we just go with our variety principle?”

“I don’t know about letting that go too far. What about the creatures whose lives happen to ‘end’ very early?”

“Sounds like a sad event, doesn’t it?”

“Yes, it does. But if the creatures realize, as I do, that even a moment of life is better than none at all, they should finally be able to make peace with such a sad loss.”

“OK, let’s say they learn to do that. The question I have is, what will they think of us?”

“That’s a very consequential question.”

“I think that, after all is said and done, we can only hope they realize we made what we think are the right decisions.”

“Yes, I think that’s right. Let me wax poetic here for a moment.”

“Go ahead. We could use some poetry about now.”

“Let’s say one evening there’s this intelligent creature, who happens to walk down to a lake that doesn’t have ice on it, because the weather is warm. He or she looks up and sees the blue sky with some white clouds in it. The sun is just going down on one crinkle of land or mountain, and it’s sending this rosy afterglow into the sky. Maybe there are some sky creatures that happen to fly overhead. On the other side of the lake, he or she sees a big piece of leftover material, which right now we’re calling a moon, that has already made its appearance, because it’s where it can reflect some of the sunlight. Now, he or she notices that the whole picture in the sky is reflected in the water.”

“The person sees the sky looking up and looking down?”

“Yeah. Remember, we said that’s what water would do – reflect things that are above it. Anyway, he or she or both of them, if they happen to be a couple, stand there and realize that because of what we did, they can experience such a beautiful sight. What do you think will go on in their minds?”

“I think they’d say, 'Wow, magnificent! I don’t know who invented it, but they sure did a great job.'”

“I hope so.”

“I have one more very interesting question.”

“What?”

“When one of the smart creatures ‘completes’ his or her life, or when these creatures just think about that happening, how much should they know?”

“Can you please clarify the question?”

“Well, should they know if something else does or doesn’t come after the lives they’re living?”

“That is a very interesting question.”

“Yes, it is. Why don’t we look at it from both sides?”

“Go on.”

“What if they know for sure there’s something afterward. What happens?”

“How much are they going to appreciate what they have?”

“Right. And what are we doing here, going to all this trouble to invent something wonderful if it’s just a stopover on the way to a better place?”

“Makes sense. Now, let’s suppose they know for sure there’s nothing after it. What now?”

“Hmm, any thoughts on that?”

“Well, it seems to me that the more they appreciate their lives, the more they’ll be able to come to terms with such a thought."

“It would seem that way. But what happens if we just leave the question open?”

“Can we do that?”

“I don’t see why not. We’re talking about what creatures know in the universe we’re inventing, not what they know about what might or might not be outside of it.”

“You’ve got a very convincing point there. They should be able to know everything that’s in what we’re inventing but what’s outside of it – “

"– should, at least, not be their primary concern.”

“Well, I think it only would be if they didn’t see much in what we’ve done.”

“So what if we just leave the question unanswered and let them make up their own minds?”

“Like it. Sounds perfectly appropriate to me.”

“And it goes with – “

“– I know, I know, our variety principle.”

“I thought the variety thing was quite evident. I wasn’t going to say that.”

“Oh, sorry. What were you going to say?”

“That it goes with the idea that we said they should be free to make up their own minds.”

“Yes, it does. So let me recap. The smarter creatures can learn everything about what’s inside the universe we’re inventing and they can ask questions about what might or might not be outside of it.”

“I can’t imagine a better arrangement.”

“Neither can I. So that does it. My only hope is that these smart creatures appreciate what we invented enough to love whatever they want to think may or may not have invented it.”

“Hey, that brings up a really interesting question.”

“What?”

“Should there be a way for them to know about us?”

“What? They can’t realize we did things like make the place they get to live in magnificent – that blue sky, gold sun, the green plants, all the other creatures?”

“I guess if they’re as smart as we hope they are they’d be able to read a lot about us from that.”

“Right. They read backward from what we invented. It’s good, we’re good.”

“You mean, good overall? I mean, this freedom thing is going to allow for some really sorrowful events.”

“You want to abridge it?”

“No, not within the world they inhabit.”

“Right. Once it’s there, we butt out. How could they plan anything or feel any freedom and dignity if we were always stepping in and changing the rules?”

“I’ll go along with that. But let’s just suppose they want to express some appreciation for what we’ve done? What can they do?”

“What do you think?”

“I’ll tell you what. The first thing they can do is take good care of what we invented. I mean, show some respect for their lives and do the best they can with them.”

“Yeah, some respect for the entire invention.”

“If the smart creatures can’t figure out something that basic, I’m going to be one disappointed dude. And it’s back to the lab for you.”

“They’ll be fine. They may need some time to catch on, but, I can assure you, they’ve got what it takes.”

“You made sure of that?”

“We did our best. The rest if up to them. More would start to impinge on their freedom.”

“You’re right. Let’s go with that. They can show their appreciation by taking care of what they can experience. Anything else is an optional extra.”

“Agreed. We don’t need empty praise while they take their eyes off the ball. We’re above that, right?”

“We certainly are. However, I’m not too against empty praise as long as they do keep their eyes on the ball.”

“Whatever suits them.”

“Wisely said. I think we’ve got wrap.”

“Can I just ask one thing, boss?”

“Sure.”

“I brought the subject up before, but I can’t resist one more try. I think it might really be helpful if the planets that have life on them that’s smart enough to read come with an instruction manual. I mean, even the simple things they learn to make, like radios and TV’s, will come with instruction manuals. And there they are, looking at this big complex thing called the universe, and there’s no instruction manual.”

“OK. Let’s say for a moment we gave them one, and it had all the answers in it, including how to make everything they would ever discover how to make. Wouldn’t that be kind of an insult to their intelligence?”

“Interesting point. I mean, if we’re giving them brains that are appropriate to their needs, why would we take away the chance to use them?”

“Besides, where are you going to put this instruction manual? On a rock, where they’ll see it one day? It all sounds kind of unnatural to me.”

“I agree. It’s just another way of saying we don’t trust what we invented to function on its own. Besides, I like giving them challenges that make them use their brains right down to the last brain cell – or why did we put that last brain cell there?”

“I completely agree. So that does it. Can the instruction manual.”

“But, boss. Let’s go beyond the basics for a moment to spiritual stuff. If we don’t give them an instruction manual, they won’t know what to believe. They’ll develop all kinds of different beliefs, and that could cause problems.”

“Seems like a natural development to me. But I think you’re talking about the early days. Do we or do we not expect these creatures to last for millions of years?”

“At least, where they behave as intelligently as they’ve been given the ability to.”

“So in time they should figure out that the world they behold is one truth and that, if their beliefs grow out of it, they should pretty much agree on a set of beliefs. You care about the gizmo, you have all the beliefs you need, including how to make us happy.”

“And, hopefully, you can see that we believe in them enough to give them the freedom to learn things on their own, so they should read that as it’s right to give other creatures the freedom to believe whatever they want to.”

“As long, course, if they don’t hurt anybody.”

“I don’t know. This all sounds a little optimistic to me.”

“Sorry, we absolutely must trust what we invented. So forget the manual.”

“OK, OK. You win. No instruction manual. They have to figure out everything for themselves. Hey, how about if we compromise?”

“What do you mean?”

“My notes. Can I at least share them with the creatures who can read?”

“The meeting notes?”

“Yeah.”

“I don’t know about that. Won’t it tell them too much about what’s outside of what we’re inventing?”

“Hmm, I tell you what. I’ll think about it and let you know.”

“Thanks, boss. I can’t ask for more than that.”

“OK, then. Just let us know when you’re ready to launch the universe. I’d like to be there.”

“Will do.”

“Got a timeframe for the big birth?”

“We should be ready for a go in about a week.”

“All right! Looking forward to it!”

“I think we all are. See you then.”

So our final meeting came to an end. We had now invented the universe. Soon, we would be ready to rev it up and send it for a spin. And just think! If this universe worked well, who knows? We could decide to go into mass production. I was especially glad that the big boss might give me the go-ahead to release my meeting notes. And guess what? He finally came around. But, of course, now you know that, because you just read them. Enjoy the universe. We sure enjoyed making it. And remember, happy times or sad, we did our very best.

About The Author

Tom Attea, humorist and creator of http://NewsLaugh.com, has had six shows produced Off-Broadway. Critics have called his writing "delightfully funny," "witty," with "good, genuine laughs" and "great humor and ebullience."

Bush Rows Upstream In Iraq, As In Up Niagara Falls

by: Tom Attea

President Bush continues to row upstream in Iraq, even though the current seems to pick up speed every minute. In fact, he seems to be rowing up Niagara Falls. But he just keeps on going, despite the fact the majority of Americans are standing on the venerable Niagara tour boat, The Maid of the Mist, and calling out to him to quit already.

Apparently, the roar of the falls is too deafening for him to hear them. While he presents the appearance of flexibility, his goal remains the same: a peaceful, secure, and democratic Iraq. Does that sound like a fairytale or what? And can somebody please tap him on the shoulder and tell him fairytales don’t usually come true?

There’s pretty ample evidence that he should just drop the oars and slip on back down the river to more tranquil water. The terrorists and murderous sectarians have convinced most of the American public that our troops don’t belong there anymore. It’s a faint consolation for the nearly 3,000 soldiers we’ve lost that the Iraqi court finally managed to sentence Saddam Hussein to the gallows.

The situation in Iraq is so dire that the Democrats, inept at popular appeal as they habitually are, have convinced a wide swath of the electorate they can do a better job. To add insult to idiocy, the latest polls indicate that the majority of Iraqis think their nation would be more peaceful if coalition troops would depart immediately. It seems that the only Iraqis who want us to stay are president and prime minister of a government that can’t seem to control its own people.

What about the red flag the administration waves at us that, if we skedaddle, Al-Qaeda will take over Iraq? Is that bogeyman based on a real understanding of the Iraqi psyche? Neither the Sunnis, the Shiites, nor the Kurds would ever allow such a humiliation. The Iraqis are a strongly self-determined people. What do we think their explosive behavior is about?

The worst that can happen is that the Iraqi government we had such high hopes for will have to hightail it out of there, while the Iraqis settle their sectarian differences on their own, until they finally realize that if they’d just stop killing each other, they could have a peaceful, free and prosperous nation for the first time in modern times.

But they have a lot of hard lessons to learn, as do all the egregiously backward people in the region. Tough as the tactic seems, the best the modern world can do is let them learn the lessons on their own. It does no good for America or any other advanced nation to contend at their level of fanaticism and barbarism. In fact, it brutalizes our civilized sensibilities and ideals.

We should extricate ourselves and let the bodies fall where they may. Aggrieved and disappointed as we are at such an unexpectedly negative outcome, we should not entirely forget that the people of Iraq and the rest of the Middle East were once at the forefront of civilization. Their innovative promise has been stifled by ignorant and slavish adherence to beliefs that have nothing to do with their former greatness. May they one day reconnect with their progressive past and join the free and enlightened unfolding of human history.

Meanwhile, we can only wonder how long George Bush is going to keep rowing up Niagara Falls. Come on, Pres, let go of the paddles and drift back to where the water is a lot more peaceful.

About The Author

Tom Attea, humorist and creator of http://NewsLaugh.com, has had six shows produced Off-Broadway. Critics have called his writing "delightfully funny," "witty," with "good, genuine laughs" and "great humor and ebullience."

New Study Shows The Good Life May Be The Short Life

by: Tom Attea

Love the good things in life? So we do.

Unfortunately, a new study shows that if you're content with voluntary starvation you can live longer. The proof is in the monkeys.

One rhesus monkey was put on a calorie-restricted diet, while the other one was allowed to eat till content. You already know the disgusting result.

The monkey on the starvation diet stayed significantly younger-looking and was much more acrobatic, while the monkey that enjoyed all the goodies appeared much older and less rambunctious.

Lest you take comfort in the fact that the study only included two monkeys, the regrettable truth is that other studies among far more monkeys seem to confirm the findings.

But don't trash the good life just yet. The signals are still mixed.

Dr. John O. Holloszy, a Washington University professor of medicine, says, "Calorie restriction has a powerful, protective effect against diseases associated with aging. We don't know how long each individual will end up living, but they certainly have a longer life expectancy than average."

On a more hopeful note, Dr. Jay Phelan, an evolutionary biologist at the University of California, Los Angeles, tells us, "Calorie restriction is doomed to fail, and will make people miserable in the process of attempting it. We do see benefits, but not an increase in lifespan."

How about that for clear guidance?

Maybe the best news is, there are now a number of drugs being developed by biotech companies that are intended to forestall the ravages of the good life.

So all is not lost. One day the good life may also be the long life.

About The Author

Tom Attea, humorist and creator of http://NewsLaugh.com, has had six shows produced Off-Broadway. Critics have called his writing "delightfully funny," "witty," with "good, genuine laughs" and "great humor and ebullience."

More Good News About Booze

by: Tom Attea

A new medical study has provided more good news about booze. There is an ingredient in red wine that apparently really does prolong life, at least, the life of mice.

How do we know? In a recent study, mice that were fed all kinds of artery-clogging foods and fattened up were given huge doses of the elixir, while other mice were just fattened up. Despite being obese, the cardiovascular systems of the lucky mice on the regimen remained healthy – so healthy the researchers, at no less than the Harvard Medical School, rushed to publish their findings even before the study was complete.

The work, which was done along with the National Institute on Aging, determined that heavy doses of the ingredient in red wine called resveratrol, lowers the rate of diabetes, liver problems and other fat-related health problems. While it’s too soon to know if the same ingredient works in humans, some scientists were excited by the findings and even called them "spectacular."

But don’t reach for a second bottle of juice too fast. To get the amount of the ingredient that the mice were given, you would have to drink 100 bottles of red wine a day, an amount beyond the capacity of even the most delirious wino.

Yet there is hope. The promising ingredient is available as a health supplement, and without a prescription.

Of course, the usual drawback applies. It’s not available at a dose that would really make much of a difference. For that salubrious event, you’ll need a prescription. Since we all know how promptly the FDA approves new therapies, we can expect that the first prescription will probably be written for one of our great grandchildren.

About The Author

Tom Attea, humorist and creator of http://NewsLaugh.com, has had six shows produced Off-Broadway. Critics have called his writing "delightfully funny," "witty," with "good, genuine laughs" and "great humor and ebullience."

Celebrities Provide The Third Answer: Fame With Power

by: Tom Attea

The usual cynic’s choice is to ask, what would you rather have, fame without power or power without fame? Yet even a cursory look at contemporary society reveals that celebrities have managed to devise a third choice: fame with power.

There is no shortage of for instances. Take Ronald Regan, who went from fame in Hollywood to power in Washington. Or Arnold Schwarzenegger, who has so far gone from fame in Hollywood to power in Sacramento, with his eyes on DC, if his advocates can only get the constitution amended so that a born Austrian can run like a born American. Given the proportion of immigrants who now inhabit the land, the likelihood of Presidential power for the Terminator is hardly out of the question.

Of course, there are also lesser and more numerous instances of the celebrity’s ability to combine fame with power. How about Mel Gibson, arrested for DWI and a month later we noticed that the arresting officer was being investigated?

Or Barbra Streisand telling a fan to shut up with a word that is not usually accepted in public discourse and then blithely continuing her tour. What if a relatively powerless person like a Senator, say, John Kerry had said the ‘F” word, as in getting “stuck in f-ing Iraq?” The man would have been sent beyond temporary oblivion and been made to resign from the Senate.

Finally, we have Paul McCartney, who, though embroiled in a divorce where his bride is accusing him of abuse, was able to attend the premier of a new classical piece he managed to compose at The Albert Hall.

The time has obviously come when cynics should adjust their choices.

It seems that the only people who are in a real pickle are the ones in the unnamed group – those without fame or power. Well, that seems to include most of us. But what would all the celebrities do without us to play to? No audience, no performance.

So we come full circle, not as cynics but as optimists. Sure, there are the secretive few who have power without fame. But most people, who seem on the surface to be distinguished by neither fame nor power, may actually possess the most power, at least, over that uniquely famous and powerful group we refer to as celebrities.

About The Author

Tom Attea, humorist and creator of http://NewsLaugh.com, has had six shows produced Off-Broadway. Critics have called his writing "delightfully funny," "witty," with "good, genuine laughs" and "great humor and ebullience."

The Invention of Details, With A Final Q & A Period;The Invention of Everything, An Eyewitness Account

by: Tom Attea

At last, we came to the final meeting. It was time to invent details like gravity and magnetism. Then we were scheduled for a final question and answer period. I was waiting for the right moment to bring up my idea that every planet that would have life that can read should come with an instruction manual.

“Well, what do you know? Here we are, at our final meeting. How long do you think we need?”

“It should go pretty fast.”

“Good. Did you prepare an agenda?”

“Yes, I did. I thought we’d start with gravity, move on to magnetism, confirm food, and then cover a few elements of environmental variety that we haven’t discussed, like snow.”

“Snow? What’s that?”

“Something that happens to rain when it gets colder. I’ll get to it later.”

“What about the Q and A session?”

“I believe we scheduled that for the end.”

“Good. Then, please, proceed.”

“Thanks. First, let’s look at gravity.”

“What’s it for?”

“Do we want everything we invent to fly off the agglomerations and disappear into space?”

“Of course, not.”

“That’s why we came up with gravity. It’s this special power – force, but I know you don’t think much of that word – that makes everything that’s not attached to the planet stay put.”

“Sounds essential to me.”

“We should definitely include it.”

“Where’s it come from?”

“Oh, there are a variety of sources, because we need it in general distribution to help hold the entire invention together. But on the level of each agglomeration, it’s basically generated when the planet spins.”

“Excuse me. Wouldn’t that usually make things fly off?”

“Not in this case. The way we’re working gravity is, it actually pulls things toward the center of the planet.”

“Have you done the math?”

“Yeah. It was pretty straightforward.”

“I think he’s made a case for gravity. Let’s say we just go with it? You’ve got the votes. Please, move on.”

“Great. Next, we have something called magnetism.”

“Purpose, please?”

“Well, I have a little list.”

“The top line will do.”

“Let me give you a really convenient use for it. If all goes as planned, one day we’re going to have these pretty intelligent creatures, standing on this relatively big thing we call a planet, without a clue which end is up. This invention will let them figure that out.”

“Really?”

“Yep. Of course, once they know which end is up, they’ll also know which end is down.”

“Cool. Go on.”

“Sure thing. Anybody interested in the technology behind it?”

“An overview will do.”

“Of course. We plan to give the top of the agglomeration one magnetic charge and the bottom the opposite charge.”

“The usual binary stuff?”

“Right. Plus and minus; right, left; male, female. So pretty soon after we have creatures who are smart enough to care which end is up, they’ll learn that if they put a little piece of metal on a tiny axel it will be attracted to the top or bottom of the agglomeration, depending on the charge that’s there at the time.”

“It moves around?”

“Over time it can switch, yes. But for starters we think the little piece of metal should probably point up.”

“Would you call magnetism essential or just a convenience?”

“If I were a creature, I’d consider it absolutely essential.”

“All right, granted. Magnetism it is. What else?”

“Food.”

“Why food? I thought we covered that in an earlier meeting.”

“Let me check my notes, boss.”

“No need to. We did. I just want to review what we decided and make sure we’re all in agreement. I don’t want to hear any 'Why didn’t you tell us?' stuff when the universe is actually up and running.”

“Go ahead.”

“We know the creatures need energy, and food is the way they’re going to get it. So let’s review our choices. We can either have it shipped in or each planet can provide its own.”

“Having it shipped in feels kind of artificial to me. Every day this train of food arrives out of nowhere.”

“It would certainly be odd, especially considering that we plan for the universe to function in a perfectly natural way.”

“I’m against food shipments. I insist that the entire invention be self-sustaining.”

“You’re sure about that?”

“Of course. It certainly seems like a basic perfection to me.”

“I agree.”

“Oh, me, too. But that only leaves one choice.”

“What’s that?”

“They eat each other.”

“The creatures?”

“Yeah.”

“How happy can that make them?”

“Well, that depends on how you look at it. If all you see is part of the picture, it may not seem like such a great idea. On the other hand, if you see that the creatures have their own lives but they also contribute to the support of other creatures, it starts to make sense.”

“I see, everything has a dual role.”

“Yeah. What do you think?”

“Sounds workable. But will they have a choice about what they eat?”

“The smarter ones will.”

“And?”

“I think we said they should be free to make up their own minds. That’s part of the reason for making them smart, isn’t it?”

“Yes, it is.”

“So what will their choices be?”

“Well, they can decide to eat plants and animals or just plants. I don’t think many of them will decide just to eat animals.”

“Why not?”

“We’re leaving that simple choice up to the simpler creatures. The smart ones will realize that a well-rounded diet is much better.”

“What if the smarter ones don’t like the idea of eating other animals?”

“They could get by on plants.”

“What about the simpler creatures? Do they ever eat the smarter ones?”

“There might be occasions. We have to trust the smarter ones to watch out.”

“OK. I’ve heard enough about food. I’m for the self-sustaining setup. All in favor? Excellent. I believe you have another subject to cover?”

“Yeah. Rain.”

“We already covered that.”

“Yes, we did. But only as rain.”

“What else is there?”

“I want to talk about some interesting concepts we have about how it might transform itself.”

“Transform itself? Why would it do that?”

“We figure it will be heat sensitive.”

“Hmm, go on.”

“When it gets hot, it could float up as something we’re calling steam.”

“Steam?”

“Yeah. We derived it from the idea of a stream. Just deleted the ‘tr’ because we thought the idea of transformation is evident without it.”

“It works for me. Anything else?”

“Yes, sir. When the temperature gets colder.”

“Of course. Up, down; hotter, colder.”

“Obviously, two is one of your favorite numbers.”

“Yeah, I love what you can do with it. One is so limiting, but as soon as you go to two, wow, the possibilities really get exciting.”

“Go on.”

“Right. When it gets a little colder, it could turn into something we call frost.”

“Which is?”

“Kind of a cold coating.”

“That’s it for rain?”

“No, no. Two more things.”

“Hey, this stuff is really quite versatile.”

“Yes, it is. And fun to work with, like when the sky gets even colder.”

“What happens then?”

“We get something I mentioned up front: snow.”

“Yes?”

“Now, instead of coming down as plain water, the rain comes down as these really cool white flakes.”

“Hey, that does sound like fun.”

“What happens when the frosty flakes hit the ground?”

“Sometimes they pile up.”

“And?”

“The ground can get what we call slippery.”

“Is that a problem?”

“It can be. Things can slide around and bang into each other. Creatures can slip.”

“Uh-oh. I don’t know if I like that.”

“But it can also be a pack of fun. Creatures young and old and slide on it. On balance, I like it as part of environmental variety.”

“Be quite pretty to see all that white stuff coming down.”

“Yeah, but water is heavy. Won’t the white things hurt the creatures when it lands?”

“Not the way we’re planning it. The flakes will actually be quite light. That’s why we call them flakes.”

“How did you arrive at that term?”

“We combined ‘floating’ and ‘lakes.’'’

“Oh, I see. Like floating lakes?”

“Right.”

“Lots of water, but light enough to float down?”

“Exactly.”

“Neat.”

“What about the long-term effects. I don’t want the land covered up with it forever.”

“Not to worry. As soon as the weather warms up, it becomes water again.”

“Good. Anything else for rain?”

“Just one more thing. We figured when the temp gets even lower, it could turn into something hard as a rock.”

“Why that?”

“Couple of reasons. First, rain that’s already on the ground as water. The hard stuff, which we’ve given the working name of ice, could form a layer on top of the water so, no matter how cold the sky gets, the covering would actually keep the creatures warmer.”

“I like that. We don’t want the water creatures to get too cold.”

“Especially not frozen. They’d be stiff and that would mean they couldn’t swim.”

“Nice. I like ice.”

“And get this. It will be slippery, just like the snow. So the creatures could have fun with it, too.”

“Sliding around on it?”

“Yeah. But we have a word for it that just seems to sound colder than skidding.”

“What?”

“Skating.”

“Ice skating?”

“Yeah. You should try it.”

“Whatever. You people are having entirely too much fun down in the lab.”

“Anything else?”

“Ice in the sky.”

“In the sky? I don't know about that.”

“Can you provide some clarification?”

“Sure. When the sky is cold, the rain could also fall down as ice balls.”

“Ice balls? Why have that?”

“Well, if we’re really serious about everything happening in a perfectly natural way, and we agree that when the temps get really cold, the water becomes ice, then, if the water happens to be falling from the sky when it’s really cold, it should be able to come down as ice.”

“Can you just assure me of one thing?”

“What?”

“I need you to keep the ice balls relatively small. I don’t want any enormous round things hammering the creatures.”

“Let me make a note of that. I’m sure we can build in a control.”

“Anything else?”

“No, sir. That actually about does it for inventions.”

“OK, great. Inspired work, really. Congratulations.”

“Thank you.”

“Can we have a hand for the entire team in tech?”

“Stop, you’re embarrassing me.”

“OK, then. What do you say we move to the Q & A session? Question, anybody?”

“Yeah, as a matter of fact, I do have one. I can understand how the simpler creatures will be happy. They’ll just do the basic things without thinking too much about life in general. My concern is the smarter creatures. We decided they’re going to be smart enough to think about themselves, right?”

“That’s the plan.”

“Here’s the question. Will being able to do that make them happier? I mean, if it doesn’t, why bother?”

“Well, I think that depends on the creature who’s doing the thinking.”

“In what way?”

“Different ones will have different opinions.”

“Are you saying some of them might not be happier?”

“I’m saying, if they’re as free as we agreed they should be, yes, some of them are bound to be less than jolly.”

“I’m not sure I like that.”

“Well, being able to decide that is consistent with our variety principle. If we’re true to it, we should allow for some of them to be really happy and others to be really unhappy.”

“It certainly seems that way to me.”

“I have a more basic question. If they have all these processes going on inside them just to keep them alive, how are they going to have time to think about anything but the processes?”

“Oh, no problem. We plan to put all those functions on autopilot.”

“Really?”

“Yeah. We figure, why make the creatures think about the billions of things that will be going on to keep them alive. We want to free them up to think about their lives, do things they actually want to do, and, my favorite subject, think about and discover the given.”

“The given?”

“What the universe is made of, how it works, etc.”

“Now, of course, you’re referring to the creatures who become scientists?”

“Yeah. They’re going to have a great time, trying to figure out all we put into this thing.”

“What else are the creatures going to think about?”

“I think we have to deal with the hard question.”

“Which is?”

“Well, the smartest creatures are going to realize they don’t last forever. How is that going to affect them?”

“Hmm, good question.”

“I think they should just do what my grandmother always told me and that’s to count their blessings.”

“Yeah, but that only goes so far. Put yourself in their position. You love another creature. Then the creature you love – “

“– careful now. Do not use the word I disapprove of, whatever you do.”

“Yes, sir. The other creature completes his or her life. What do you think? Happy, sad?”

“I’m surprised you’d ask. No way we want to invent creatures who would be happy at a time like that. How insensitive would that be? I would want creatures who would feel sad.”

“Me, too. But not forever.”

“Fine. But now let’s face up to the question in a general sense. How do they deal with the realization that none of them is going to live forever.”

“Well, let’s talk about that. Seems to me if they’re smart enough to consider such a question, they’re also smart enough to figure out the choices we had to make.”

“In what sense?”

“If every creature lived forever, how long would it take for the planet to fill up? After all, there’s only so much space.”

“Right. So pretty soon there wouldn’t be any room for new creatures.”

“Exactly. So I think realizing that should help them understand the overall idea we’re going with.”

“Which is?”

“Lifespans – for creatures, planets, whatever.”

“You mean, everything gets a certain share of the whole life of the universe?”

“Right. And if you value it – “

“– Hey, right. That’s it!”

“What?”

“The way they’ll finally be able to think.”

“Go on.”

“If they value life enough, they’ll know what a great thing it is to be part of, even if just for part of the whole thing.”

“Sounds like a reasonable conclusion to me.”

“Right. They’d realize some life is better than none. In fact, that it’s pretty fantastic, even if it can’t last forever.”

“Makes a tremendous amount of sense to me. How much of a share do you think each creature should have? Want to set an amount?”

“Seems kind of stiff and unnatural to me. What do you say we just go with our variety principle?”

“I don’t know about letting that go too far. What about the creatures whose lives happen to ‘end’ very early?”

“Sounds like a sad event, doesn’t it?”

“Yes, it does. But if the creatures realize, as I do, that even a moment of life is better than none at all, they should finally be able to make peace with such a sad loss.”

“OK, let’s say they learn to do that. The question I have is, what will they think of us?”

“That’s a very consequential question.”

“I think that, after all is said and done, we can only hope they realize we made what we think are the right decisions.”

“Yes, I think that’s right. Let me wax poetic here for a moment.”

“Go ahead. We could use some poetry about now.”

“Let’s say one evening there’s this intelligent creature, who happens to walk down to a lake that doesn’t have ice on it, because the weather is warm. He or she looks up and sees the blue sky with some white clouds in it. The sun is just going down on one crinkle of land or mountain, and it’s sending this rosy afterglow into the sky. Maybe there are some sky creatures that happen to fly overhead. On the other side of the lake, he or she sees a big piece of leftover material, which right now we’re calling a moon, that has already made its appearance, because it’s where it can reflect some of the sunlight. Now, he or she notices that the whole picture in the sky is reflected in the water.”

“The person sees the sky looking up and looking down?”

“Yeah. Remember, we said that’s what water would do – reflect things that are above it. Anyway, he or she or both of them, if they happen to be a couple, stand there and realize that because of what we did, they can experience such a beautiful sight. What do you think will go on in their minds?”

“I think they’d say, 'Wow, magnificent! I don’t know who invented it, but they sure did a great job.'”

“I hope so.”

“I have one more very interesting question.”

“What?”

“When one of the smart creatures ‘completes’ his or her life, or when these creatures just think about that happening, how much should they know?”

“Can you please clarify the question?”

“Well, should they know if something else does or doesn’t come after the lives they’re living?”

“That is a very interesting question.”

“Yes, it is. Why don’t we look at it from both sides?”

“Go on.”

“What if they know for sure there’s something afterward. What happens?”

“How much are they going to appreciate what they have?”

“Right. And what are we doing here, going to all this trouble to invent something wonderful if it’s just a stopover on the way to a better place?”

“Makes sense. Now, let’s suppose they know for sure there’s nothing after it. What now?”

“Hmm, any thoughts on that?”

“Well, it seems to me that the more they appreciate their lives, the more they’ll be able to come to terms with such a thought."

“It would seem that way. But what happens if we just leave the question open?”

“Can we do that?”

“I don’t see why not. We’re talking about what creatures know in the universe we’re inventing, not what they know about what might or might not be outside of it.”

“You’ve got a very convincing point there. They should be able to know everything that’s in what we’re inventing but what’s outside of it – “

"– should, at least, not be their primary concern.”

“Well, I think it only would be if they didn’t see much in what we’ve done.”

“So what if we just leave the question unanswered and let them make up their own minds?”

“Like it. Sounds perfectly appropriate to me.”

“And it goes with – “

“– I know, I know, our variety principle.”

“I thought the variety thing was quite evident. I wasn’t going to say that.”

“Oh, sorry. What were you going to say?”

“That it goes with the idea that we said they should be free to make up their own minds.”

“Yes, it does. So let me recap. The smarter creatures can learn everything about what’s inside the universe we’re inventing and they can ask questions about what might or might not be outside of it.”

“I can’t imagine a better arrangement.”

“Neither can I. So that does it. My only hope is that these smart creatures appreciate what we invented enough to love whatever they want to think may or may not have invented it.”

“Hey, that brings up a really interesting question.”

“What?”

“Should there be a way for them to know about us?”

“What? They can’t realize we did things like make the place they get to live in magnificent – that blue sky, gold sun, the green plants, all the other creatures?”

“I guess if they’re as smart as we hope they are they’d be able to read a lot about us from that.”

“Right. They read backward from what we invented. It’s good, we’re good.”

“You mean, good overall? I mean, this freedom thing is going to allow for some really sorrowful events.”

“You want to abridge it?”

“No, not within the world they inhabit.”

“Right. Once it’s there, we butt out. How could they plan anything or feel any freedom and dignity if we were always stepping in and changing the rules?”

“I’ll go along with that. But let’s just suppose they want to express some appreciation for what we’ve done? What can they do?”

“What do you think?”

“I’ll tell you what. The first thing they can do is take good care of what we invented. I mean, show some respect for their lives and do the best they can with them.”

“Yeah, some respect for the entire invention.”

“If the smart creatures can’t figure out something that basic, I’m going to be one disappointed dude. And it’s back to the lab for you.”

“They’ll be fine. They may need some time to catch on, but, I can assure you, they’ve got what it takes.”

“You made sure of that?”

“We did our best. The rest if up to them. More would start to impinge on their freedom.”

“You’re right. Let’s go with that. They can show their appreciation by taking care of what they can experience. Anything else is an optional extra.”

“Agreed. We don’t need empty praise while they take their eyes off the ball. We’re above that, right?”

“We certainly are. However, I’m not too against empty praise as long as they do keep their eyes on the ball.”

“Whatever suits them.”

“Wisely said. I think we’ve got wrap.”

“Can I just ask one thing, boss?”

“Sure.”

“I brought the subject up before, but I can’t resist one more try. I think it might really be helpful if the planets that have life on them that’s smart enough to read come with an instruction manual. I mean, even the simple things they learn to make, like radios and TV’s, will come with instruction manuals. And there they are, looking at this big complex thing called the universe, and there’s no instruction manual.”

“OK. Let’s say for a moment we gave them one, and it had all the answers in it, including how to make everything they would ever discover how to make. Wouldn’t that be kind of an insult to their intelligence?”

“Interesting point. I mean, if we’re giving them brains that are appropriate to their needs, why would we take away the chance to use them?”

“Besides, where are you going to put this instruction manual? On a rock, where they’ll see it one day? It all sounds kind of unnatural to me.”

“I agree. It’s just another way of saying we don’t trust what we invented to function on its own. Besides, I like giving them challenges that make them use their brains right down to the last brain cell – or why did we put that last brain cell there?”

“I completely agree. So that does it. Can the instruction manual.”

“But, boss. Let’s go beyond the basics for a moment to spiritual stuff. If we don’t give them an instruction manual, they won’t know what to believe. They’ll develop all kinds of different beliefs, and that could cause problems.”

“Seems like a natural development to me. But I think you’re talking about the early days. Do we or do we not expect these creatures to last for millions of years?”

“At least, where they behave as intelligently as they’ve been given the ability to.”

“So in time they should figure out that the world they behold is one truth and that, if their beliefs grow out of it, they should pretty much agree on a set of beliefs. You care about the gizmo, you have all the beliefs you need, including how to make us happy.”

“And, hopefully, you can see that we believe in them enough to give them the freedom to learn things on their own, so they should read that as it’s right to give other creatures the freedom to believe whatever they want to.”

“As long, course, if they don’t hurt anybody.”

“I don’t know. This all sounds a little optimistic to me.”

“Sorry, we absolutely must trust what we invented. So forget the manual.”

“OK, OK. You win. No instruction manual. They have to figure out everything for themselves. Hey, how about if we compromise?”

“What do you mean?”

“My notes. Can I at least share them with the creatures who can read?”

“The meeting notes?”

“Yeah.”

“I don’t know about that. Won’t it tell them too much about what’s outside of what we’re inventing?”

“Hmm, I tell you what. I’ll think about it and let you know.”

“Thanks, boss. I can’t ask for more than that.”

“OK, then. Just let us know when you’re ready to launch the universe. I’d like to be there.”

“Will do.”

“Got a timeframe for the big birth?”

“We should be ready for a go in about a week.”

“All right! Looking forward to it!”

“I think we all are. See you then.”

So our final meeting came to an end. We had now invented the universe. Soon, we would be ready to rev it up and send it for a spin. And just think! If this universe worked well, who knows? We could decide to go into mass production. I was especially glad that the big boss might give me the go-ahead to release my meeting notes. And guess what? He finally came around. But, of course, now you know that, because you just read them. Enjoy the universe. We sure enjoyed making it. And remember, happy times or sad, we did our very best.

About The Author

Tom Attea, humorist and creator of http://NewsLaugh.com, has had six shows produced Off-Broadway. Critics have called his writing "delightfully funny," "witty," with "good, genuine laughs" and "great humor and ebullience."

Presidential Prospects of John Kerry Not Very Merry

by: Tom Attea

Although John Kerry was not very merry when he lost his bid for President, he continued to maintain that he deserves a second chance. He might have had one if it weren’t for two very significant obstacles: Hillary Clinton and John Kerry.

There is little he can do about the allure of Hillary. Though she’s a member of the party that seems determined to be at odds with the inclinations of most Americans, she might have so much appeal that she can pull off a Presidential win.

But a more significant obstacle for Senator Kerry is the Senator himself. Veteran politico that he is, he seems to have run his own swift boat into the rocks. How could he have allowed himself such an egregious misjudgment as to state before a university audience that anybody who doesn’t study hard could “get stuck in Iraq”?

Oh, he did have the sense to offer an apology, or was persuaded to provide one. But what a lame excuse. He said he misspoke and actually meant to say that such a neglectful student could become a President who gets the nation stuck in Iraq. The circumlocution is so awkward it would only have a place in a very hastily scribbled script and would very likely be misspoken. It matters little.

He gave the Republican lions just the steak they were longing to have tossed to them and they went to work on it ravenously. He also became, in the opinion of many of his fellow Democrats, a candidate with a mild case of leprosy.

Given the inviting choice of Hillary Clinton and his own woeful punch at his own jaw, just how merry can his prospects be for a second run as the Democratic candidate?

Of course, he can always promise to have his mouth wired shut. But it’s hard to imagine a Presidential candidate with such an encumbrance on the campaign trail. At least, he would have a credible excuse for misspeaking.

About The Author

Tom Attea, humorist and creator of http://NewsLaugh.com, has had six shows produced Off-Broadway. Critics have called his writing "delightfully funny," "witty," with "good, genuine laughs" and "great humor and ebullience."

Mixers, Pinatas and Other Illegal Items

by: Edie Deween

Shhhh....if you're in Texas, watch your mouth or you could be arrested. No, I'm not talking about yelling “fire” in a public place or threatening someone. I'm talking about having a private conversation in a private home about a private matter. Whatever you do, don't tell anyone in Texas how to use a sexual aide. If someone has a beef against you, you could be talking to an undercover officer.

Passion parties...sort of like Tupperware parties for the bedroom....have become increasingly popular over the last few years. It's what some women do on girl's night out. It is also a side income for many people. Law-abiding folks engage in this, much the same way as folks bet on office pools. Yet, like betting, it can turn the average citizen into a criminal.

That's what retired schoolteacher, Joanne Webb, found out when she tried to supplement her family's income through passion parties. You see, it's ok to sell that type of stuff if you market them right. You have to say that they're for novelty purposes. If you actually explain what they're really for, you could face up to a year in jail and a $4,000 fine.....at least in Texas.

I live in Georgia where I supplement my income through selling lingerie and a few “novelty” items. I see nothing wrong with selling sexual toys, and I hope that statement is still considered lawful. However, I see that it's in my best interests legally to instruct women on alternative ways to use my products.

The vibrator vibrates. I think I can say that. It moves around fast and rhythmically. It has 3 speeds. It could be used as a mixer. The most popular version is the rabbit. I guess it's because it makes us women so hopping happy when our recipes turn out right.

I've been trying to figure out how to use those masks, blow-up dolls, and extra vibrators. I'm putting them in a box and labeling it “Deluxe Pinata Kit.”

Those flavored lubricants are great for putting on your cat's nose to help with the furballs. My cat likes grape.

Those body oils are for dry skin.

Those fur-covered handcuffs are for when Alaskan police officers want to arrest somebody.....like passion party hostesses.

Those body paints....well, sometimes all you want is a temporary tattoo.

Those edible underwear....if I stick a nutritional label on it, can I say it's junk food?

And, of course, we all know what women are after when they wear lingerie. I won't tell them how sexy their men will find them when they wear those bustiers. Instead, I'll just say, “You won't look fat in this.”

Hopefully, those instructions won't be offensive to law-makers.

And...lawmakers...it's offensive to me....the average citizen....to have my words this closely monitored by you. When I'm selling a taxed, non-lethal product to a person aged 18 or older, it shouldn't matter how I explain it's uses. Geez, what's so criminal about helping a couple have a good time? Bonnie and Clyde never used a vibrator to rob a bank

About The Author

Edie Deween has many witty articles that she writes for her shop, Hot Stuff Leather and Lace. When you stop by, be sure to check out her sexy lingerie and clubwear( http://www.hotstuffleatherandlace.net ) while you are there.

Iran Continues To Star As The Mouse That Roared

by: Tom Attea

Hardly a day goes by that we don’t hear diminutive Iran roar like a lion about its nuclear ambitions. Or growl about its mighty power by launching yet another flight of missiles. Yet among the world’s most powerful nations Iran remains inarguably diminutive. So, regardless of all the bluster, it can never be more than the mouse that roared.

The powers that be can observe and even indulge Iran, but they know quite well that the mouse better behave itself, because they can always give in a backhand and send it sprawling across the floor and scurrying back into its hole.

Are we attempting to make fun of the descendants of the Darius? No. We have a more considerate goal.

Our intention is to reveal that the efforts of its leaders to brandish weapons and pretend to be a superpower are unwisely conceived. They hope to be what, due to their nation’s size and resources, they can never be.

Far better to spend their national treasure on the prosperity of their citizens, instead of on nuclear armaments that, at their most dangerous, certify them as a possible target for a nuclear attack. And far more productive to join the family of nations as a peaceful and prosperous member than to bellow impossibilities.

But these hopes may be too revolutionary, at least, for now. So we have to settle for the most that’s likely. If the little nation will just stop roaring, the powers that be have shown plenty of willingness to throw it some cheese and let it nibble away in peace.

About The Author

Tom Attea, humorist and creator of http://NewsLaugh.com, has had six shows produced Off-Broadway. Critics have called his writing "delightfully funny," "witty," with "good, genuine laughs" and "great humor and ebullience."

What If Everybody Promised Not To Kill Anybody For Just One Day?

by: Tom Attea

Now, here’s a radical idea. As we see the body count pile up in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Africa, along with the daily occurrences of murder worldwide, including right here in the gun-toting USA, we ask ourselves, wouldn’t it be wonderful if everybody would promise not to kill anybody for just one day?

Imagine, an entire 24-hours without a single person being killed by another person? One day and one night without having to see a tearful human being lamenting the murder of someone they love.

A complete rotation of the earth without enduring one murderer inanely presenting himself or herself for justice to be done.

Could a day so blissfully murder-free even convince a would-be malefactor or two not to go ahead with a planned murder scheduled for the next day?

In these spiritually barbarous, though technologically advanced, times, it would, of course, be far too unrealistic to hope that everybody would promise not to kill anybody for two days in a row. How could the human race, still woefully uninformed about the merits of locating inviolable sanctity in life itself, restrain its murderous inclinations?

While Marx said “Man is a wolf to man,” even that dour economic theorist did not understand to what extent man is the primary cause of man’s tragedies.

Which brings us to the cheerful conclusion of our proposed “murder takes a holiday.” If we stopped shooting ourselves in the foot, we might even feel like dancing.

About The Author

Tom Attea, humorist and creator of http://NewsLaugh.com, has had six shows produced Off-Broadway. Critics have called his writing "delightfully funny," "witty," with "good, genuine laughs" and "great humor and ebullience."

USO Sending Paris Hilton Britney Spears and Jessica Simpson to Iraq

by: Karen Fish

It definitely looks like it’s time for everyone to lighten up. Yesterday General Electric the parent company of NBC, fresh from their success with the Madonna concert at Wembley Stadium in London announced that it had instructed its news anchors to now refer to the conflict in Iraq as a “Civil War.” Today President Bush fired back that Iraq was not in a “Civil War.” A Civil War according to the dictionaries is defined as a struggle between various groups (or regions) of a country. If that’s the case then why wasn’t Iraq called a Civil War months ago? Are we all illiterate or just completely spun out and brainwashed?

President Bush is a stubborn Southern Man. Years ago Neil Young wrote a song about the American Civil War called “Southern Man”. Here are the lyrics: “Southern man better keep your head, Don't forget what your good book said, Southern change gonna come at last, Now your crosses are burning fast, Southern man, I saw cotton and I saw black, Tall White Mansions and little shacks. Southern man when will you pay them back? I heard screamin' and bullwhips cracking How long? How long? Southern man better keep your head, Don't forget what your good book said, Southern change gonna come at last, Now your crosses are burning fast. Southern man. Lily Belle your hair is golden brown, I've seen your black man comin' round, Swear by God I'm gonna cut him down! I heard screamin' and bullwhips cracking How long? How long?”

Now we are told that Iraq is having a Civil War. Isn’t that an oxymoron? The Americans and the Iraqis are certainly not acting in a civil fashion. People are definitely not engaged in a civil war when they routinely use power drills on their captives’ bodies prior to beheading them in snuff films shown on Al- Jazeera television. No wonder President Bush turned off the power in Bag Dad. Doesn’t he remind you of Prince Charles just waiting for the Queen to die? King charles will be a King who once stated that he wished to reincarnate as Camilla’s bicycle seat. No wonder England no longer has an Empire. At least New York has an Empire State building.

For the past 3 years President Bush has been pounded by journalists and voters alike because the journalists and voters claim that there was no connection between 9/11, Al Qaeda and Iraq, and the White House insists that there was in order to justify Iraq. Weren’t the Al Qaeda hijackers on 9/11 and the Iraqis all Muslim? President Bush said today that the sectarian violence rocking Iraq is not civil war but part of an Al Qaeda plot to use violence to goad Iraqi factions into repeatedly attacking each other. "No question it's tough, no question about it," Mr. Bush said at a news conference with Estonian President Toomas Hendrik Ilves. "There's a lot of sectarian violence taking place, fomented in my opinion because of the attacks by al Qaeda in Iraq causing people to seek reprisal.”

Hasn’t anyone told President Bush that Al Qaeda are Sunnis fighting the Shiites? Hasn’t anyone mentioned to President Bush that sectarian violence is the definition of Civil War? Maybe he thinks that Civil War is only when the North fights the South, or the Sunni East fights the Western Shiites and the Northern Kurds. In any event Estonian President Ilves pledged to send a troop to Iraq because just in case America wins he wants a share of the oil. Where is Estonia? Is it really even a country or just some fiction created by the White House to bolster their baloney about having a coalition of the willing? Very few people are still willing to listen to President Bush’s baloney any longer including his own American people. It turns out that the Dixie Chicks were right and the Americans were wrong three years ago to stop playing the Chicks’ music on the radio and for refusing to buy their albums. Why aren’t the American media screaming that it was President Bush who brought Al Qaeda into Iraq in the first place? They wouldn’t dare go near Iraq when President Hussein was living it up in his golden palaces with his golden showers.

In January 2004 CBS News became involved in their own civil war. They aired a story about President Bush’s National Guard service. It was decided that some of the facts were wrong and CBS News fired 4 of their staffers including 3 executives including senior vice president Betsy West, executive producer Josh Howard and senior broadcast producer Mary Murphy aka Eminem. At the time CBS Chairman Leslie Moonves issued this statement on behalf of CBS: “We deeply regret the disservice this flawed 60 Minutes Wednesday report did to the American public, which has a right to count on CBS News for fairness and accuracy.” CBS had reported that President Bush had failed to appear for a physical exam while in the National Guard. CBS News asked former Attorney General Dick Thornburgh and former Associated Press President Louis Boccardi to conduct an independent investigation into the matter and they prepared a 224 page report. White House spokesman Scott McClellan said the administration appreciated CBS' steps to hold people accountable. Conservative pundit Rush Limbaugh insisted the network "had an axe to grind" with President Bush. Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz said it would take the network a long time to get over "a high-profile blunder."

Al Gore got more votes in the 2000 election but lost to President Bush. This CBS mountain out of a molehill incident and the Swift Boat baloney cost John Kerry the Presidency and handed it to President Bush. The story didn’t even mention that President Bush was a lying warmongering deserting alcoholic. In the good book Jesus Christ says, “You strain at gnats yet you swallow camels whole.”

Presently a bipartisan panel, led by Daddy’s former Secretary of State James Baker III and former Rep. Lee Hamilton, D-Ind. is trying to figure out a new strategy in Iraq. The members, according to CBS News correspondent David Martin have agreed on an all-out diplomatic offensive with Iraq's neighbors — including Iran and Syria — to get help in stabilizing Iraq. However President Bush continued to express his reluctance to talk with two nations he regards as pariah states working to destabilize the Middle East. Who came up with the phrase “People who live in White Houses shouldn’t throw stones”?

Meanwhile David Icke reports that Daddy Bush is in Saudi Arabia at a séance of the Carlysle Group being presided over by its chairman Count Hans Kolvenbach, aka The Black Pope, the Jesuit General, and the ruler of the New World Order announced by President Bush in his State of the Union Address. They are channeling instructions from their masters the space lizard Illuminati on what to do next. Don’t be alarmed. Every Egyptian, Greek and Roman Emperor had their oracles. I guess the American voters do not expect as much from their leaders as the shareholders of the Oracle Corporation. The Roman Emperor had to recall Pontius Pilate to Rome for excess brutality. The Appian Way leading into Rome was lined with crucifixes as a warning to visitors not to mess around. Those were the days when Emperors knew how to conquer the World.

Imagine Alexander the Great with 25,000 100 megaton nuclear bombs and vast storehouses of chemical and biological weapons. It would have taken him maybe 3 hours to conquer the Middle East for America in partnership with Russia. People conduct wars too civilly today. It’s like watching paint dry. Get it over with already so Jesus can come. Maybe that’s why Count Kolvenbach sent Pope Benedict XVI to Turkey, to spark the Apocalypse. These reptiles are vicious bloodthirsty monsters and they have their finger on the button. At least they have good senses of humor. President Bush is going to fly to Iran to beg President Ahmidinejad’s Cleric puppet masters to help him out in Iraq. Superman couldn’t get us out of this pickle. This calls for Spam Man. CBS News President Sean McManus now reports that in an effort to boost troop morale the USO is sending Paris Hilton, Britney Spears, Jessica Simpson, Kanye West, Bono, Elton John and Beyonce to the Green Zone to “entertain” the troops and to commemorate the 10th anniversary of the death of Princess Diana. Watch for special guest appearances by British soldiers Prince Harry and Prince William, who are to be introduced by Spam Man.

About The Author

Karen Fish is a writer currently living in Los Angeles California.
The Temple of Love http://www.thetempleoflove.com